Posting Suspended
I want to send a big THANK YOU to Channel 9/WCPO for providing a link to this blogsite in their story about Alicia Reece.
Channel 9 must not have known that I no longer post blog entries here. My new blog home is the Cincinnati Black Blog which can be found at http://blackcincinnati.blogspot.com.
Future of Democratic Party Meeting Tonight!
The first public hearing on the City of Cincinnati 2005-2006 Biennial Budget is tonight at 6:00 p.m. at the Madisonville Community Center, 5320 Stewart Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 45227.
Then the Cincinnati Board of Education meets tonight at 6:30 p.m. to discuss a proposal to shut down schools on the east side and fire teachers.
Then there is a meeting hosted by the Hamilton County Democratic Party. The email I received from someone, certainly not The Whistleblower's Charles Foster Kane, is below:
To: "Nathaniel Livingston"
Subject: Post Election Gathering
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:06:37 -0500
You are invited!
The Hamilton County Democratic Party is hosting a post election gathering at 7:00 on Nov 22 at the Letter Carriers Hall at Colerain and Blue Rock in Northside. We we will provide beer, soft drinks, snacks and a few surprises.
More importantly we are going to hold two panel discussions. Some additional panelists are in the process of being finalized. The first panel will review the November 2nd election and the second panel will concentrate on the future of the Democratic Party in Hamilton County.
Panel Discussion 1: What Happened in Hamilton County
· Commissioner Todd Portune- the First Democrat to be reelected as a Hamilton County Commissioner in over 50 years.
· O'dell Owens MD- the first African American to be elected to a county executive office in history.
· Brewster Rhoads- Political Consultant, what the numbers tell us.
Panel Discussion 2: What's next and how to stay involved
· Rep. Tyrone Yates- keeping the commitment alive.
· Jenny O'Donnell, Ph.D- The Democratic Forum.
· Jody Grundy- Chair of the Kerry House Party operation (which raised over $100,000), will discuss keeping Kerry volunteers involved.
· Tim Burke- Opportunities in the Democratic Party
Please join the Hamilton County Democratic Party, local candidates, volunteers, community leaders, activists and the Kerry campaign for this very important meeting.
For more information Please contact the Hamilton County Democratic Party at 421-0495.
What's Our Issue 1?
Jene Galvin and Jerry Springer
I want to thank Jene Galvin for pushing me to write about ballot initiatives. I've been meaning to do this for quite some time but never got around to it. Saturday, Jene, who runs Jerry Springer's JerryForOhio.com and MakeOhioBlue.com websites asked "What's Our Issue 1?":
Republicans are smart. They know that a candidate who sponsors a ballot initiative that catches on with voters is almost guaranteed a win because he sets the agenda (everyone is debating his/her proposal), they get plenty of free face time to discuss their issue, they get the benefit of organizing the petition drive (somebody has to collect all of those signatures), and if the initiative is popular it helps mobilize the base who, of course, vote for the genius who put the initiative on the ballot. Think back -- Jim Tarbell, Phil Heimlich, and Charlie Winburn all used ballot initiatives to help them get elected to City Council. And that's one reason Ken Blackwell is pushing his tax reform ballot initiative.
Now for those of you who don't know, Jene Galvin is to Jerry Springer what Karl Rove is to George Bush. (Well, not exaclty ... but close.) So, Springer wants to be Ohio's next Governor and Jene wants to know what he can do to help. (Again, not exactly ... but close.) I know! What about a ballot initiative??? But... what's the issue?
Jene Galvin wrote this:
I'll gladly give Karl Rove props for conjuring a ballot issue that drove out the necessary evangelical votes to win close elections in battleground states. In Ohio, that was Issue 1, which said marriage is only between a man and woman.
Rove sought an emotional question that would pull out some people that research said had been soft in recent presidential elections. And the issue had to be one that would slide some votes over to Bush as well. He picked a winner, and it was part of his victory in Ohio.
So, with 2006 being an opportunity for Democrats to shove Ohio's hot mess down Republicans' throats in state elections, is there a ballot issue that could spike one of our natural constituencies? On Nov. 2, our inner city voters performed at about the 60% level while suburban, mostly Republican voters, came out in the high 70s.
So would an Ohio minimum wage proposal do it? Or a demand that schools be funded equitably?
Or is there a ballot issue that would draw out huge numbers of college students, one, say, dealing with rising tuition costs?
What would you propose?
But before I do, I've got to get this off my chest. Karl Rove and George W. Bush did more than just put initiatives on the ballot. For years, Republicans had ignored, or in some cases fought with, Christian conservatives. These people didn't feel appreciated by the Party and stayed out of politics. Rove/Bush reached out to their base, listened to their concerns, and became advocates for their causes. Those Evangelical Christians are now a solid and reliable block in the Republican Party's base.
Contrast that with the Democratic Party where African Americans are, if not the most loyal, certainly one of the most loyal base constituents the Party has ever had. For years, African Americans have been complaining about how they are treated by the Democratic Party. But there has never been an effort made by the Democratic Party to address these problems. They just take Black people and our votes for granted. When is the last time the Hamilton County or Ohio Democratic Party reached out and listened to our concerns? When's the last time Tim Burke or Denny White had a town hall meeting to listen to us? Democrats don't do anything to recruit new people into the Party. Even worse, I can tell you true stories of African Americans in Cincinnati who have tried to get involved in the Democratic Party but found themselves being turned away. One of them is Councilman Sam Malone. And, unfortunately, the Jene Galvins and Jerry Springers of the world -- who are respected in the Party, have the leaderships ear and could talks some sense into them -- haven't said or done anything to change this. Then the Party wonders why turnout among city voters and African Americans isn't as high as the folks in the suburbs. So, ballot initiatives are a good idea but they won't solve the problem which is systematic exclusion of all but a few well-connected folks in the Party. That ends my lecture for the day. Now let me give a few suggestions on ballot initiatives.
These aren't in any particular order of importance.
- Clean Energy - On election day, while "gay marriage" amendments were passing in 11 states including Ohio, the people of Colorado passed Amendment 37 requiring the state's largest utility companies to increase their use of renewable sources from less than 2% today to 10% by 2015. There are soooo many good reasons to do this I can't name them all - health, environment, etc. And the debate would fire up many traditional Democratic voters who rightly believe we've morphed into Republicans. Of course the big business polluters will fight such a proposal using every fear tactic ever invented but with high outrageous energy costs already people will listen to reason. And so what they've got money, we've got people. If it's done right, we win and so does the environment.
- Health Care - There is already a move to make medical care a public service. I've gotta tell you, I think Democrats focus too much on health care and they don't do it right. Health care is just not a winner. Everytime I hear Steve or Alicia Reece say "the #1 cause of death is health" (whatever that means) it let's me know that they don't understand the issue and neither do most people. Besides, I think the numbers are inflated. During the last election, the Enquirer contacted me and asked for my opinion on Kerry's vs. Bush's health care plan. I declined to participate. I've actually had times when I had three separate health care plans -- two from my employer and 1 from the VA. Still, I could be wrong. This might be a great issue. People might really need the coverage. This might encourage them to vote.
- High Speed Light Rail - Light rail isn't just for people who like nice choo choo trains, it's about jobs, mobility, and economic development. For as long as I can remember there have been proposals to bring high speed light rail (I'm not even sure if this qualifies as light rail) to Ohio and connect Ohio's major cities. I haven't finished reading through the Ohio Rail Development Commission's study but what I have read has caught my attention. People want to feel like they are moving into the future and helping advance society for their children. High Speed Light Rail could work on a state level and help encourage local municipalities to build companion rail lines.
- Jobs with Justice - I don't remember exactly who was responsible for trying to put the Jobs with Justice petition on the ballot. It might have been the Cleveland Jobs with Justice group, or Justice Watch, or the Intercommunity Justice and Peace Center, or maybe the Greater Cincinnati Coalition for the Homeless. Whoever it was, about 10 years ago they were circulating a petition to have the state create and support jobs with justice after poor people were kicked off Welfare. The theory was that the State of Ohio would pay people to rebuild the State's infrastructure. It's been long enough that I don't remember how they proposed to do this but the thought was a good one.
- Eliminate Property Taxes for School Funding - In March 1994, Michigan voters approved a 2% sales tax increase that replaced about 2/3 of the local school property tax. Yeah, I know sales taxes are the most regressive taxes possible and hurt the poor but I also know property owners shouldn't have to be the only people paying for public education when everyone benefits from it. If everyone benefits (or has the potential to benefit) then everyone should pay. I don't say follow Michigan's example and go to sales taxes for education, I do think, however, that creative Democrats have an opportunity to change the way we fund public schools. If Democrats do this, they will find support not just among city dwellers but also among rural and suburban voters who have left our party in search of reformers. Property taxes are a sore spot with people and should be addressed. A great opportunity to bring people back to our side.
- Affirmative Action - Among the most divisive issues in our nation are guns, God, gays, and race. Why don't Democrats beat Republicans to the punch on this one. Place an initiative on the ballot that does away with ALL preferences - race, gender, veteran's status, The initiative will never pass.
Beatdown In Motown
So much has been written about the basketbrawl match between the Detroit Pistons and Indiana Pacers, I can hardly add anything. My sweetie emailed the video-clip to me this morning so, because I thought it was funny, I decided to share it.
Way To Go Out
Don't know if this is real or not, or where this is located, but I do know this... where they bury me in a pine box they can put similar words on my tombstone.
[Big thanks to Greg Beck]
The Blog Is Back
I'll got a new blog skin and intend to resume blogging here effective immediately. First-thing-first. The Luken/McAdams/Painter misconduct scandal information will be copied to this blog.
Blog Problems
Ok. The blog looks terrible. Until I can get the code issues worked out all blogging will be done on Cincinnati Black Blog.
Mayor Mallory Update
Yeah. I know he hasn't been elected yet but I wanted to see how Mayor Mallory sounded. I just left the press conference and it cleared up a number of thing. First, Mark Mallory announced that he is indeed running for Mayor. (I certainly hope he doesn't drop out of the race.) Second, Roxanne Qualls was at the press conference, she introduced Mallory, and she endorsed his candidacy. (So much for her getting into the race, unless Mallory drops out.) Third, according to cincynation.com, Mark Painter says he hasn't made up his mind about running for Cincinnati Mayor and says he will decide by January, 2004. Nick Spencer reports receiving an email from Judge Painter reading:
Korte's quotes were accurate. But I certainly didn't imply that I would not run. It's very early--we still have a presidential election in a few months. Mallory may or not end up running. I will decide by the first of the year.
(I'll have a little more on Judge Painter and his conflicts in a separte blog later today.)
A few things I noticed about the Mallory for Mayor press conference. He had a number of elected officials and former elected officials there. Besides Qualls and, of course, his dad, former State Rep. William Mallory, Sr., there was State Rep. Steve Driehaus (a young, conservative, westside, old school Democrat), former State Rep. Sam Britton, Cincinnati School Board member Melanie Bates, a current member of the Ohio Senate and current member of the Ohio General Assembly. The National Organization for Women's Cathy Helmbock was in the house. And failed Green Party council candidate Wes Flinn was present. (The question is can Helmbock and/or Flinn help mobilize votes and funds for Mallory?)
Who was absent? State Representatives Catherine Barrett and Tyrone Yates. (Catherine Barrett got the seat from Mallory and most people believe she wouldn't be there without the support of the Mallory family. Her abscence was noticable.) The Democrats on City Council (Alicia Reece, David Crowley, John Cranley, Laketa Cole, and David Pepper.) Mark's Democratic Party co-chair Tim Burke. No one from the Baptist Ministers' Conference, or the NAACP, or the Urban League, or any of the social service agencies. No one from the business community (even though Mark's Senate district covers most of downtown). No activists (unless you include me).
The best question (there were only three) came from the Post's Kevin Osborne about whether Mark would give up his position with the Democratic Party while running for Mayor. This is important because when Laketa Cole first ran for City Council, the Democrats made a big stink about her running while maintaining a position with the Cincinnati Democratic Committee. A little free advice for Mallory: you can't talk about building coalitions without fixing any issues you have with Laketa Cole and former Mayor Dwight Tillery. Mark would be wise to acknowledge that mistakes have been made in the Democratic Party (including the attacks on Cole) and offer Tillery an olive branch. Luken will use anything to divide Mallory from potential voters.
Greg "No Reportee" Korte Catching Up on Mallory Move
So, Nick Spencer thinks my take on Mark Mallory's political announcement is "interesting if a little conspiratorial". (Look for more on Nick Spencer later today.) I wonder if he thinks the same thing about Greg Korte's story in today's Cincinnati Enquirer.
Vice Mayor Alicia Reece is still considering several options, including the mayor's office, said father and campaign manager Steve Reece. Other possibilities are Ohio secretary of state and Mallory's Senate seat, which comes open by term limits in 2006.That sounds an awful lot like what I wrote yesterday. There is nothing "conspiratorial" about it. Korte does have a few "new" pieces of information for a change. According to Korte, Judge Mark Painter said he probably won't enter the race if Mallory does. And David Pepper confirmed that he is exploring running and has sent out a fund raising letter.
I failed to mention two things yesterday. The first is the possibility that Catherine Barrett would move up to the State Senate and Alicia Reece would take her place in the General Assembly. This is highly unlikely for two reasons. First, Reece doesn't live in Barrett's house district, so to qualify, she would have to change addresses from Integrity Hall. (Does anybody believe she resides there?) Second, Yates isn't about to let Barrett advance to the State Senate. I don't think Mallory can pull this deal off. The second is that somebody needs to run for Hamilton County Commissioner against Pat DeWine. I can see Mallory agreeing to drop his Mayoral bid for enough cash and support to mount a campaign agaist DeWine. I can also see Reece, Pepper, or Cranley agreeing to make that part of the deal. And don't count out this scenario, Luken might feel like he can't win the Mayoral primary and gently agree to move to the County Commission if he felt like he could beat DeWine and come away looking like a "good" Democrat.
Is Mark Mallory REALLY Running For Mayor or Democratic Party Musical Chairs
Do you remember playing musical chairs as a child? Someone always got eliminated because there weren't enough chairs. The announcement by Mark Mallory tomorrow signals the beginning of the Hamilton County Democratic Party's version of musical chairs. Who will get left out?
Here's the lowdown. Mallory finds himself term limited from the State Senate in 2006. He can run for the General Assembly (a position he has already served in) or he can come home from Columbus. My sources tell me Mark wants to come home and he wants to remain an elected official. Mark has made his desire known to Tim Burke and the rest of the Democratic Party where he serves as co-chair. Since the Party didn't seem interested in helping Mallory stay in office, he announced that he was considering a run for Mayor.
This is from the Whistleblower's "Real Faxes From Real Subscribers":
Quisling Charlie has till today to try to buy me off, or I'll be running my fellow DemocRAT's white ass out of town in the mayor's race next year. --Mark MalloryOf course, Mallory isn't looking for Luken to buy him off. He is, however, a young man and he has to look out for his future. (He wouldn't want to be "retired" and sitting at home like Minette Cooper, would he?) Here is the plan.
- Mallory announces he is running for Mayor.
- His competition is Charlie Luken, David Pepper and Alicia Reece. (Mark Painter, Charlie Winburn, and Christopher Smitherman may run but they aren't Mallory's primary competition.)
- Alicia Reece is term limited from City Council in 2007. Her last race would be in 2005. Everyone knows she wants to move on to higher office. (That push by Alicia's daddy to get her selected as the Vice Presidential candidate hasn't worked and the ongoing push to have her considered for Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, or Congress hasn't exactly been effective.) She could cool her heels, support Luken, and run for Mayor in 2007. That's too risky. You can't predict who competition would be then. Roxanne Qualls? Mallory? Pepper? Some new comer? So, Mallory offers Reece a deal. Sit out the Mayor's race and take his seat in the State Senate. That way she gets out of City Hall and can continue to establish/strengthen her contacts in Columbus and upstate, and SHE DOESN'T SPLIT THE BLACK VOTE. Once Reece gets out of the race, she can officially maintain a neutral position in the Mayor's race (Mallory and Luken are both Democrats after all), or she can publicly support Luken (like she did when he ran against Courtis Fuller) while secretly telling her supporters to vote for Mallory because a Mallory win means she is "moving on up" like George and Weezie.
- But there's a problem. Tyrone Yates is a State Representative and he won't let Reece walk into the State Senate. Yates might threaten to mount a campaign of his own which could be troublesome. To counter this, Mallory has to cut a deal.
- With Reece out, Mallory can cut a deal with Pepper or Luken for what he really wants. A simple seat on City Council. Whoever cuts him the best deal guaranteeing their support for his City Council run and Alicia Reece's run for State Senate (and their opposition to Yates' candidacy) gets his support and probably becomes (or remains) the Mayor.
- If Yates is swift, he can force Reece to settle on a move to the General Assembly.
When the music stops, Mallory is on City Council, Reece is in the General Assembly, Yates is in the State Senate, Pepper is still on Council, and Luken is still the Mayor.
If you've read this far you must be wondering, Nate, if Mallory really wants to be on City Council and he is the Democratic Party's co-chair, why doesn't he just say so? Well, no Mallory has ever ran for City Council and won. His brother, Judge William Mallory, Jr. ran and lost. His dad ran and couldn't get funding or support from the Party. By running for Mayor, Mallory can force the Democrats to give him the support that they didn't give to his dad and his brother or face a potential fight that could split the Party and give Republicans control of the Mayor's Office and control of City Council. If Mallory is eventually "persuaded" to leave the race, he looks like a "good" Democrat who is more concerned about the Party than himself. If they don't cut Mallory a good deal he has the potential to win. Any way you look at it, Mallory loses nothing by running.
Blog Envy
Brian over at Cincinnati Blog has a few comments about me, this blog, and the Cincinnati Black Blog. As usual he fails to get his facts straight (he claims the CJC's website was "suspended") and can't resist taking a personal dig at me. Whatever makes him feel good....
Brian, you know that I should be YOUR Congressman.
Three More Downtown Businesses Closing
I can't understand why downtown business owners continue to support Luken and oppose the Cincinnati Boycott. The Business Courier reports that two more downtown businesses are closing. The Courier doesn't report that AAA Unison Computer store is also closed. Luken could've stopped the Cincinnati Boycott a long time ago by entering into negotiations with boycott leaders. Instead, he chose to gamble with the livelihoods of downtown business owners. Those owners are suffering because of Luken's decisions and their continued support of the weak mayor.
Fund Established for Roselawn Drowning Hero
The Cincinnati Post reports that a fund has been set up at Fifth Third Bank for teenaged hero Thierno Barrie. I'm making my donation today!
Boycott Cincinnati website update.
During the last year, the Coalition For A Just Cincinnati -- the leading Cincinnati Boycott organization of which I serve as co-chair -- received hundreds of complaints about our website. Most of the complaints were about comments made on our message board. Well, we took the website down for a few weeks but the organization decided to put it back up.
Most of you wouldn't believe the type of email received by the CJC. Monica forwarded this one to me a few weeks ago. Check it out.
From: Jjpfaffl@aol.comThe "dark" problem?
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:14:34 EDT
Subject: Check out Davis Furniture To Close Doors After 102-Year Run
Click here: Davis Furniture To Close Doors After 102-Year Run Another victim of "The Dark Problem"
Mallory For Mayor
Mark Mallory is a good man who comes from a fine family. It looks like he may announce his plan to run for Mayor of Cincinnati on Tuesday. If the choice is Luken or Mallory, I'll vote for Mallory every time.
UPDATE: The Cincinnati Post has a story about Mark Mallory possibly running for Mayor. The time and date of the announcement differs from the Enquirer. According to the Post Mallory will make his annoucement in the West End. That makes sense to me. The Enquirer, however, says the announcement will be made in Columbia Tusculum. On this one, I'd bet the Post is right.
At Least 50 Deaths Following Taser Shocks
Last December, City Council voted to spend more than $1 million to buy 1100 stun guns (at a cost of $799 a piece) from Taser International, but not before listening to Taser president Tom Smith tell the City that no one had died after being shocked by one of their tasers and only four serious injuries had resulted after more than 3,500 taser shocks. And not before hearing a doctor on Taser's payroll tell Council that tasers pose no threat to people with pacemakers. (As usual, the lazy local media failed to investigate any of the claims made by Taser representatives. And since the purchase there has still been no investigation of Taser. The media has also failed to ask what policy, if any, has been put in place for deployment of tasers. The media printed everything Luken and Taser International said as truth.)
Now the New York Times reports that since 2001 at least 50 people have died after being shocked by a taser. Six of those deaths happened in June! As if that weren't enough, the Times further reports:
Stop right there. Before the City bought the tasers, Amnesty International, Cincinnati Cardiologist Joe Hackworth, Alicia Reece, Christopher Smitherman, Laketa Cole, and a whole host of concerned citizens begged the City to get more research before making the purchase. As usual, the hot-headed bullies at City Hall (with Luken out in front) won the battle and spent the money. Maybe the City will listen to the voices of reason next time. Probably not.Taser International ... says its weapons are not lethal, even for people with heart conditions or pacemakers. The deaths resulted from drug overdoses or other factors and would have occurred anyway, the company says.
But Taser has scant evidence for that claim. The company's primary safety studies on the M26, which is far more powerful than other stun guns, consist of tests on a single pig in 1996 and on five dogs in 1999. Company-paid researchers, not independent scientists, conducted the studies, which were never published in a peer-reviewed journal. Taser has no full-time medical director and has never created computer models to simulate the effect of its shocks, which are difficult to test in human clinical trials for ethical reasons.
What is more, aside from a continuing Defense Department study, the results of which have not been released, no federal or state agencies have studied the safety, or effectiveness, of Tasers, which fall between two federal agencies and are essentially unregulated. Nor has any federal agency studied the deaths to determine what caused them. In at least two cases, local medical examiners have said Tasers were partly responsible. In many cases, autopsies are continuing or reports are unavailable.The few independent studies that have examined the Taser have found that the weapon's safety is unproven at best. The most comprehensive report, by the British government in 2002, concluded "the high-power Tasers cannot be classed, in the vernacular, as `safe.' " ... A 1989 Canadian study found that stun guns induced heart attacks in pigs with pacemakers. A 1999 study by the Department of Justice on an electrical weapon much weaker than the Taser found that it might cause cardiac arrest in people with heart conditions. In reviewing other electrical devices, the Food and Drug Administration has found that a charge half as large as that of the M26 can be dangerous to the heart.
Apparently sensing that Cincinnati is led (if you can call it leadership) by a bunch of fools, the Taser representative came to town and simply lied about injuries resulting from the use of their product. They guessed that the City wouldn't bother investigating their company or their product, and they knew the City wouldn't insist (as suggested by Reece) on a "hold-harmless" agreement. The City could probably prevail in a fraud lawsuit, but that would require Luken and the six goofballs who voted in favor of the purchase to admit that they were deceived.
How long before Reece's concern that someone is going to sue the City for arming the cops with these dangerous weapons, for failing to investigate tasers before purchasing and placing them on the street, and for failing to give cops appropriate guidelines for when to use tasers? The City probably can't prevent lawsuits but they can insist Chief Stricher immediately prepare a deployment policy for taser usage.